An American authority has ruled against the interests of the high-tech cab service provider, Uber.
An American authority has ruled against the interests of the modern cab service provider, Uber. Uber news reported that the California Labor Commissioner’s office has stated that the firm’s driver should be recognized as a worker. It has been revealed that the verdict ordered the cab service to pay $4152.20 in costs and other expenses to Barbara Ann Berwick for her two-month long service, while the transporter has claimed that it does not control the worker’s driving hours.
Uber news today informed that the firm has decided to appeal against the decision, to which, the legal experts stated that the verdict could be changed if the firm’s action succeeds. Government sources highlighted that the California’s law forces employers to reimburse workers for business expenses.
The policies of firms, such as Lyft, Uber, and Instacart, have often been questioned as objections are raised against their provided job opportunities. The office’s decision was highlighted by the organization’s decision to challenge the verdict. The authority has stated the worker has been involved in every aspect of the driving operation.
The San Francisco based modern transporter has responded by stating that it cannot be forced to act according to the judgment and the decision can only be applied to a single driver. Company sources responded that similar rulings have been given in a number of other states, such as Texas, Pennsylvania, and Georgia. In May, Florida’s authorities also stated that a former Uber driver should be recognized as an employee, as reported by Uber technologies.
Senator Mark R. Warner has favored the ruling of the authority, as he has stated that the verdict of the California’s labor regulatory body highlights the need for reexamination of the employment classifications and 20th Century definitions. Industry experts believe that if the cab service provider’s appeal fails, then it might be forced to amend the means by which it benefits from the services of drivers.
Labor rights lawyer, Shannon Liss-Riordan, has stated that the state regulatory body’s decision would help the cause of similar pro driver petitions. It is probable that the regulator’s verdict would attract other drivers towards the labor office.
An official of the National Labor Relations Board, Wilma B. Liebman, has stated that she will not be surprised if a large number of similar suits are filed. The company should now take steps to present its case in the best possible manner or it might fail to continue its operations in an effective manner.
No comments:
Post a Comment